where . Here we see in equation 3, the cross-sectional area of the proton
is exposed to the normal force, , mediated by the ‘stiffness of space’ as measured
by G, producing the proton mass, ."
We suggest equations 1 and 2 are correct because they yield the proton radius closely. They
give it as (by equating them) [3, 4]:"
6. "
"
The CODATA value from the PRad experiment in 2019 gives"
"
With lower bound , which is almost exactly what we got."
We can see equation 6 may be the case because we get it from Planck Energy ,
Einsteinian energy, , and the Compton wavelength when we
introduce the factor of , which is the golden ratio conjugate, where the golden ratio,
[3, 4]."
I explain this factor by invoking Kristin Tynski, her paper titled: One Equation, ~200 Mysteries:
A Structural Constraint That May Explain (Almost) Everything [2]."
Tynski shows that for any system requiring consistency across multiple scales of observation
has the recurrence relation:"
7. "
Which she says leads to"
8. "
Whose solution is ."
For the proton radius in our computations we will use"
"A measurement of the atomic hydrogen Lamb shift and the proton charge radius"%
by Bezginov, N., Valdez, T., Horbatsch, M. et al. (York University/Toronto)%
Published in Science, Vol. 365, Issue 6457, pp. 1007-1012 (2019)."
It has a value of "